http://www-hrem.msm.cam.ac.uk/~cbb/publications/NMEAPL2002/
Applied Physics Letters

Nitride mediated epitaxy of CoSi2 on Si(001)

R.K.K. Chong

Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119260

M. Yeadon

Institute of Materials Research and Engineering, 3 Research Link, Singapore 117602, and

Dept of Materials Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119260

W.K. Choi,

Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119260

E.A. Stach

NCEM, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720

C.B. Boothroyd

Dept of Materials Science, University of Cambridge, Pembroke Street,

Cambridge CB2 3QZ

 

Abstract

Epitaxial layers of CoSi2 have been grown on Si(100) by the technique of nitride-mediated epitaxy.  An ultrathin layer of silicon nitride was formed on the Si(001) surface by exposure to ammonia gas at 900°C, followed by the deposition of  a layer of Co ~20Å in thickness at room temperature.  The sample was then annealed at 600ºC and the microstructure monitored by in-situ transmission electron microscopy and diffraction.  The formation of epitaxial islands of CoSi2 was observed directly, with no evidence of the formation of intermediate phases.  The CoSi2 islands were found to be elongated along the in-plane Si<110> directions, consistent with reports of the deposition of Co by molecular beam epitaxy on clean Si(100) at low deposition rates and elevated temperature. This technique of silicidation may be of particular interest in the fabrication of advanced devices incorporating multilayer oxide/nitride gate stacks.


Paper

As ULSI (ultra large-scale integration) design rules move into the deep submicron size regime, the fabrication of integrated circuits places increasingly stringent demands upon the performance of materials and processing technologies.  The need to form ultra-shallow junctions at the source, drain and gate electrodes of the MOSFET (metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistor) device is an established challenge, and single-crystal epitaxial silicide contacts are an attractive potential solution.  Epitaxial silicides are preferred over their polycrystalline counterparts because of their smoother interfaces, excellent layer uniformity and superior thermal stability[1],[2].  In particular, CoSi2 is superior to TiSi2 since its formation is not linewidth-dependent[3].  Additionally, CoSi2 exhibits low resistivity (14 mW cm), low lattice mismatch with Si (-1.2%), and good process compatibility with VLSI (very large-scale integration) technology[4],[5]. However, a simple postjunction silicidation, involving room temperature Co deposition followed by a high temperature anneal, does not lead to the formation of epitaxial CoSi2 except in the case of Si(111)[6], an orientation which is not widely used in the semiconductor industry.

To form an epitaxial CoSi2 on Si(001), several methods have been developed including titanium-interlayer-mediated epitaxy (TIME)[7], oxide-meditated epitaxy (OME)[8], high-temperature sputtering (HTS)[9], molecular beam epitaxy on clean Si surfaces under ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) conditions1,[10], the template method[11], allotaxy[12] and fabrication by mesotaxy, using high-energy, high-dose, Co implantations[13].

In this Letter we report the synthesis of epitaxial CoSi2 layers on Si(001) by first depositing an ultrathin layer of silicon nitride.  A layer of Co ~20Å in thickness was subsequently deposited over the nitride layer and the sample annealed at a temperature of 600°C.  The formation of epitaxial CoSi2 (with cube on cube orientation) was observed during the annealing process.  No evidence of the formation of any intermediate or second phases could be found during annealing, which was monitored in-situ using transmission electron diffraction.  The technique of nitride-mediated epitaxy may be of particular interest in advanced CMOS front-end–process technology for the fabrication of devices incorporating multilayer oxide/nitride gate stacks.

Our experiments, involving the use of ultrathin nitride layers, were performed in the polepiece of a modified transmission electron microscope to enable us to monitor the growth and microstructural evolution in-situ.  The system is equipped with electron beam evaporation, gas injection and sample heating capability (1400°C) with a base pressure of 1.5 x 10-10 Torr (JEOL JEM 2000V).  Boron-doped, p-type Silicon on Insulator (SOI) wafers (resistivity 6-9 Wcm) with <001> orientation were used as starting substrates.  The silicon layer was ~1500Å in thickness, and the oxide layer ~3000Å.  Electron-transparent samples were prepared by dimpling and chemical etching from the back side of the substrate.  The samples were cleaned according to the Shiraki method9, with a layer of Shiraki oxide formed on the Si surface prior to insertion into the growth chamber, which is built around the polepiece of the objective lens.

The samples were heated in-situ to ~1100ºC to remove surface oxide, before being cooled to room temperature to confirm the formation of a clean Si surface.  Electron diffraction and imaging were used to confirm the absence of SiC islands, which are observed to form on samples either contaminated during preparation, or poorly outgassed prior to heating to 1100ºC.

Ammonia gas (99.95%) was then injected into the chamber and a partial pressure of 5x10-6Torr was stabilized.  The sample was heated to a temperature of 900ºC in the ammonia ambient, for a period of 2 hours, before being cooled to room temperature and the ammonia flow terminated.  High resolution phase contrast imaging, in combination with selected area electron diffraction, was used to confirm the formation of a uniform film of amorphous silicon nitride over the Si surface (image not shown). The thickness of the amorphous layer was estimated from high resolution images recorded from the very edge of the sample to be ~10Å.  Electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) analysis confirmed the incorporation of nitrogen into the sample, with no detectable carbon contamination (due, for example, to ammonia exposure).

Approximately 20 Å of Co was subsequently deposited (at room temperature) over the anorphous nitride layer, again in-situ, by electron-beam evaporation at a rate of ~10Å per hour.  The pressure in the chamber was maintained below 5x10-10 Torr throughout the Co deposition sequence. Growth of the Co layer was monitored periodically under the electron beam, and the film was observed to nucleate and grow as 3D islands of random orientation, as determined by electron diffraction. 

Following Co deposition, the samples were heated to a temperature of 600ºC.  As the temperature was increased from room temperature, a significant coarsening of the Co layer was observed, with the film breaking up into isolated islands of Co with no continuity between islands.  The Debye-Scherrer diffraction rings from the Co  film became less broad as island size increased, as expected.  No evidence of any reaction was observed until the annealing temperature of 600ºC was attained, approximately 5 minutes from the start of heating.  At this stage, the first signs of reaction were indicated by the gradual formation of elongated islands in the bright-field images, emanating from the Co islands.  Diffraction patterns recorded at this stage revealed the emergence of a new set of reflections, which correspond to the CoSi2 (200) planes, in addition to the existing Debye-Scherrer Co rings.  The long axes of the CoSi2 islands formed parallel to the two in-plane Si<110> directions, with no apparent preference for either direction.  In Figure 1(a) we present a bright-field image recorded at short exposure time (0.1s) due to the presence of sample drift following the ramp to 600°C.  The presence of both Co islands and CoSi2 islands (arrowed) may be seen.  As the CoSi2 islands gradually increased in size, the Co islands decreased in number density and diameter (Figure 1(b)) until they were no longer discernible (Figure 2(a)).  Diffraction patterns recorded at this stage show no evidence of the presence of any remaining Co, and a representative example is presented in Figure 2(b). 

[figure 1]

Figure 1: Bright-field electron micrographs of the sample during the annealing process at 600ºC showing the microstructural development after (a) one minute and (b) two minutes annealing.

[figure 2]

Figure 2: (a) Bright-field electron micrograph of the sample upon completion of the silicidation sequence.  Inset is a trace of the facets of one of the islands. (b) Selected area diffraction pattern recorded with the beam close to [001].

The observed CoSi2 exhibits the cube-on-cube epitaxial orientation, with Si(100) // CoSi2 (100) and Si[110] // CoSi2[110].  With the reaction apparently complete (after ~15 minutes at 600ºC), the sample was cooled to room temperature and the thermal drift allowed to stabilize.  Electron energy loss spectroscopy analysis at this stage revealed that the N K-edge was still detectable, indicating that the silicon nitride layer was most likely still present at the sample surface.  This is consistent with previous observations of oxide-mediated epitaxy of CoSi2 on Si(001), where the amorphous silicon oxide layer remains after silicidation1.

Analysis of video recordings made during in-situ annealing suggests that silicidation proceeds by vertical diffusion of Co through the interlayer, beneath the Co island.  We observe the growth of epitaxial cobalt disilicide laterally, along the Si surface, the growth front moving away from the shrinking Co island along one of the two in-plane <110> directions.  Whilst it might be assumed that Co is diffusing primarily along the silicon: silicon nitride interface, subsurface diffusion of Co in Si can be substantial[14] and this may also play a role at this annealing temperature.  The presence of nanoscale islands elongated along the in-plane Si <110> directions suggests the early stages of growth may be dominated by a balance between interfacial energies in competition with heteroepitaxial strain relaxation[15], [16].  From bright-field images such as that presented in figure 2(b), facets in some of the larger islands can be clearly distinguished (see inset) by a mass-thickness image contrast mechanism.

From the electron diffraction evidence, it is apparent that, upon reaching the Si surface, the Si-rich phase CoSi2 is formed directly, with no evidence of any intermediate Co2Si or CoSi phase formation being detectable.  This is consistent with previous studies of the growth of epitaxial CoSi2 on Si(100) by oxide-mediated epitaxy by Kleinschmit et al[17].  The absence of silicon-rich phases during the annealing process is key to the success of the oxide-mediated epitaxy technique, since full reorientation of non-epitaxial grains by a mechanism such as grain growth is unlikely once such regions have nucleated.

In the case of MBE deposition of Co on Si(100) under UHV conditions, Vantomme et al.10 showed that epitaxial CoSi2 could be formed on Si(100) by directly depositing Co at substrate temperatures of ~600°C and with deposition rates below 0.1Ås-1.  The arrival rate of Co atoms at the Si surface was found to be critical to the formation of an epitaxial layer.  In the case of OME, only the Shiraki oxide has been found to be successful in mediating the epitaxial growth of CoSi2, and neither the native nor thermally grown oxides can be used successfully without the use of reducing layers such as Ti7,[18].  The Shiraki oxide is known to be a highly defective oxide, and it is likely that the discontinuities in the oxide provide rapid-diffusion paths for Co through the layer.

 Amorphous silicon nitride is known to exhibit a porous structure, with a range of densities depending upon the stoichiometric composition[19].  Recent structural models suggest extensive internal open pore structures[20]; these could provide excellent pathways for Co diffusion and be consistent with the low values reported for the activation energy for diffusion of Co and related metals in Si3N4[21].  Both the oxide and nitride interlayers are therefore apparently acting as purely physical barriers in their mediation of the silicidation reaction, limiting the Co flux to the silicon surface and maintaining the Si rich enviroment conducive to the formation of an epitaxial CoSi2.

The use of silicon nitride as an interlayer may offer particular advantages in the fabrication of devices incorporating thin nitride layers as part of the heterostructure.  For example, there is substantial interest in fabricating FET devices comprising alternating oxide and nitride layers as part of a multi-layered stack for the gate dielectric[22],[23],[24]. As the gate dielectric typically adjoins the region in which epitaxial cobalt disilicide is desired, nitride-mediated epitaxy may be a viable technique compatible with this technology.  During the fabrication of the oxide-nitride multi-layered stack, the formation of the first nitride layer of the multi-layer could be extended over the source and drain contact regions (Figure 3(a)), followed by the addition of one or more other layers to the stack region.  Subsequent deposition of a layer of Co (covering both the stack region as well as the nitride-coated source and drain contact regions, Figure 3(b)) followed by annealing would result in the formation of an epitaxial cobalt disilicide at the source and drain contact regions (Figure 3(c)).  Clearly, continuous CoSi2 layers would be required for device fabrication; such layers could be formed either by deposition of a thicker layer of Co, or by the repeated deposition of Co followed by annealing[25].

[figure 3]

Figure 3: Schematic diagram of process steps exploiting the technique of nitride-mediated epitaxy to fabricate the source and drain regions of a CMOS device.  (a) formation of a layer of silicon nitride over the Si surface, (b) deposition of Co layer, and (c) final annealing step to form epitaxial source and drain contacts.

In conclusion, we have observed the early stages of the nucleation and growth of epitaxial CoSi2 on Si(100) using an ultrathin layer of silicon nitride to mediate the reaction. The absence of Co-rich silicide phases throughout the reaction sequence has been confirmed by in-situ transmission electron diffraction. The results are consistent with a model for interlayer-mediated epitaxy whereby the nucleation and growth of the silicide is at least initially controlled by the rate of supply of Co to the Si interface, with the interlayer acting as a physical diffusion barrier.  This enables a Si-rich environment to be maintained and the nucleation of a single orientation of CoSi2 to proceed.  The presence of nanoscale islands elongated along the in-plane Si <110> directions suggests the early stages of growth may be dominated by a balance between interfacial energies in competition with heteroepitaxial strain relaxation. The role, if any, of the interlayer in determining the balance of interfacial energies is not yet clear, however, since the silicon: silicon nitride interface presents an additional constraint on the energy balance of the system.  The technique may be of particular interest for application in devices incorporating nitride layers as part of the gate stack structure and may provide an alternate process option for epitaxial silicide incorporation.  Further investigations are currently in progress.

The authors thank the Singapore Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), and the Ministry of Education (MOE) for funding this research.  RKKC acknowledges the support of Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Pte Ltd; EAS acknowledges funding through the Director, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences Division of the U.S. Department of Energy under contract No. DE-AC03-76SF00098. 


References


[1]   R. T. Tung, Mater. Chem. Phys. 32, 107 (1993).

[2]   L.J. Chen and K.N.Tu, Mat. Sci. Rep. 6, 53 (1991).

[3]  L.M. Gignac, V. Svilan, L.A. Clevenger, C.Cabral, Jr., and C. Lavoie, in Thin Films-Structure and Morphology, MRS Symp. Proc. 441, 255 (1997), Ed. S.C. Moss, D.Illa, R.C. Cammarata, E.H. Chason, T.L. Einstein, and E.D. Williams, MRS (Pittsburgh)

[4]   S.P. Murarka, Silicides for VLSI Applications (Academic, New York) 1983.

[5]   K. Maex, Mats. Sci. and Eng. R11, 53, (1993).

[6]   R. T. Tung, J. C. Bean, J. M. Gibson, and D. C. Jacobson,  Appl. Phys. Lett. 40, 684 (1982).

[7]   M. L.A. Dass, D. B. Fraser, and C. S. Wei,  Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 1308 (1991).

[8]   R. T. Tung,  Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 3461 (1996).

[9]   K. Ionue, K. Mikagi, H. Abiko, and T. Kikkawa, Tech. Dig. Int. Electron Devices Meet., 445 (1995).

[10] A. Vantomme, S. Degroote, J. Dekoster and G. Langouche, Appl. Surf. Sci. 91, 24 (1995).

[11] S. M.Yalisove, R. T. Tung, and D. Loretto,  J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 1989, 1472 (1989).

[12]  S. Mantl and H. L. Bay, Appl. Phys. Lett. 61, 267 (1992).

[13]  A. E. White, K. T. Short, R. C. Dynes, J. P. Garno, and J. M. Gibson,  Appl. Phys. Lett. 50, 95 (1987).

[14]  M.Y. Lee and P.A. Bennett, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75(24), 4460 (1995).

[15]  V. Scheuch, B. Voigtländer and H.P. Bonzel, Surf. Sci. 372, 71 (1997).

[16] J. Tersoff and R.M. Tromp, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70(18), 2782 (1993).

[17]  M. Kleinschmit, M. Yeadon and J.M. Gibson, Appl. Phys. Lett. 75(21), 3288 (1999).

[18] C. Detavernier, R.L. Van Meirhaeghe, F. Cardon and K. Maex, Thin Solid Films 286, 19 (2001).

[19] Tim Searle (Ed.), Properties of Amorphous Silicon ad its Alloys, INSPEC, London, 1998.

[20] P. Kroll, J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 293-295, 238 (2001)

[21] F. Edelman, E.Y. Gutmas and R. Brener, Vacuum 41, 1268-1271 (1990).

[22] H. Ikeda, D. Matsushita, S. Naito, K. Ohmori, A. Sakai, S. Zaima and Y. Yasuda,

Jap. J. Appl. Phys, Part 1 (41), 2463 (2002)

[23] Q.D.M. Khosru, A. Nakajima, T. Yoshimoto and S. Yokoyama, IEEE Electron Device Letters, 23, 179 (2002)

[24] H. Yu, Y.-T. Hou, M.-F. Li and D.-L. Kwong, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 49, 1158, (2002)

[25] M. Yeadon and R. Nath, to be submitted to  J. Appl. Phys.