Errata

Paper title: Impact of Integrity Attacks on Real-Time Pricing in Smart Grids
Venue: ACM CCS 2013

Page 8, right column, 6th line of Section 5.3:
G_w(z) should be G_w(z) = z^-τ ρ ẇ(λ_o) + (1-ρ) ẇ(λ_o)

The above typo does not affect any results in the paper.

last updated @ Apr 27, 2014

Paper title: Impact of Integrity Attacks on Real-Time Pricing in Smart Grids
Venue: ADSC Tech report, 2013

Page 9, left column, 4th line of Section V-C:
W(z) should be W(z) = z^-τ ρ ẇ(λ_o) + (1-ρ) ẇ(λ_o)
Page 13, right column, 6th line of Appendix C:
T_c(z) should be 2ηz / (z - 1 + 2η)

The above typos do not affect any results in the paper.

last updated @ Apr 27, 2014

A discussion in the work on adaptive calibration was inaccurate. This discussion is

Particularly, for our problem, the system converges faster for larger a at the price of worse system stability. Therefore, the best setting for a is a value close to the upper bound σ²/S.

This discussion can be found in the following papers:

Adaptive Calibration for Fusion-based Wireless Sensor Networks, INFOCOM 2010, Page 6, right column, from 4th line to 7th line of the second paragraph.
Adaptive Calibration for Fusion-based Cyber-Physical Systems, ACM TECS, Page 12, from 5th to 7th line.

The correct statement should be:

Particularly, for our problem, when a=σ²/(2S), the system converges fastest.

The inaccurate discussion in the papers do not affect any results, since β is set to be 0.5 in the simulations and experiments, which coincides the true optimal setting for a in the corrected statement.

last updated @ Apr 28, 2014